Each software was used to screen 220 or 221 references, for a total of 882 references screened.Ĭovidence ( is a web-based screening and data extraction tool it is one of the tools recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. The final reviewer was assigned to use and review Covidence vs SRA-Helper for EndNote vs Rayyan vs RobotAnalyst (AMS). One participant was assigned to use and review Covidence and SRA-Helper for EndNote (BJ), and one was assigned to Rayyan and RobotAnalyst (FI). The systematic reviewers were asked to use allocated software packages for the title/abstract screening and dispute resolution steps of the systematic review and to complete an online questionnaire which was tailored to capture data for the software package used. Three volunteer systematic reviewers, who were commencing a systematic review (882 total citation records to screen), were recruited via email invitation from the study authors (GC and EB). This study identified a number of considerations which systematic reviewers can use as a basis of their decision which software to use when performing the citation screening and dispute resolution steps of a systematic review. Overall, participants reported that SRA-Helper for EndNote would be their software package of choice, primarily due to its efficiency. SRA-Helper for EndNote was most favoured by participants for screening citations and Covidence for resolving conflicts. FindingsĪll four software packages were reported to be easy or very easy to learn and use. ![]() They then completed a 12-item online questionnaire which was tailored to capture data for the software packages used. We recruited three volunteer systematic reviewers and asked them to use allocated software packages during citation screening. ![]() The aim of this study was to gather qualitative data on the usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages (Covidence, SRA-Helper for EndNote, Rayyan and RobotAnalyst) for the citation screening step of a systematic review. New software packages help to improve the efficiency of conducting a systematic review through automation of key steps in the systematic review.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |